Tuesday, 29 October 2013

murder—including unjust anger and contemptuous

BEING HUMAN MEANS A SIMPLE LIFE WITH GOOD FAITH AND ACTION

murder—including unjust anger and contemptuous

words (Matthew 5:21-26).
He did likewise with their narrow view of the Seventh Commandment, “You shall not commit adultery.” The Pharisees of the day under
-
stood the physical act of sexual relations with a woman outside of marriage to be sin. They should also have known, as in the case of the Sixth
Commandment, that lust for another woman was sinful because the one
lusting had already broken the Commandment in his heart.
These are examples of the “righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees” that Jesus characterized as making the outside of the cup and dish
clean, while on the inside remaining “full of greed and self-indulgence”
(Matthew 23:25, NRSV).
Jesus instructed His disciples that God’s law must indeed be obeyed
outwardly, but it must also be obeyed
in the spirit and intent of the
heart.
When Jesus taught such heartfelt obedience to God’s laws, He was
faithful to what the Old Testament taught: “For the
Lo r d does not see as
man sees; for man looks at the outward appearance, but the
Lo r d looks
at the heart” (1 Samuel 16:7).
The prophet Jeremiah looked forward to a time when God would establish a new covenant in which God promised to “put My law in their minds,
and write it on their hearts” (Jeremiah 31:33). God’s original intent for
His law was that people would observe it from their hearts (Deuteronomy
5:29). The failure of human beings to obey God’s law in the “inward
being” (Psalm 51:6, ) inevitably led to outward
disobedience.
Jesus did not change the law
Jesus prefaced His contrast of the scribes’ and Pharisees’ narrow
interpretation of the law with its true spiritual intent using the words,
“You have heard that it was said
...
But I say to you
...” (Matthew
5:21-22, 27-28).
Some erroneously think Jesus’ intention was to contrast His own
teaching with that of Moses and thereby declare Himself as the true
authority. They assume that Jesus was either opposed to the Mosaic law
or modifying it in some way.
Jesus’ Teaching on God’s Law
But it’s hard to imagine that Jesus, just after delivering the most
solemn and emphatic proclamation of the permanence of the law and
emphasizing His own high regard for it, would now
undermine
the
authority of the law by
other
pronouncements. Jesus wasn’t inconsistent;
He honored and upheld the law in
all
His statements.
In this passage He is not pitting Himself against the Mosaic law, nor
is He claiming a superior spirituality. What He
was
doing was
refuting
the wrong interpretations
perpetuated by the scribes and Pharisees. This
is why He declared that one’s righteousness must
exceed
the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees. Jesus was restoring, in the minds of
His listeners, the Mosaic precepts to their original place, purity and
power. (For a better understanding of these laws, request or download your free copy of the booklet The Ten Commandments.)
It should also be obvious that because the same God is the Author
of Old and New Covenant alike, there can be no vital conflict between
them, and that the fundamental laws of morality underlying both must
be and are in full accord. God tells us in Malachi 3:6, “I am the
Lo r d
,
I do not change
.

• If you’re not already a subscriber,
request a free subscription to our
gods-word by gaurav pawar daily artical -magazine
The Good News at         



• While you’re at it, also request a
free subscription to our
World News
and good-nwse
newsletter 



No comments: